Queen Mary University of London

OverviewReputation and RankingsApplication supportCoursesStudent FeedbackLocation
High Quality Teaching
Research Power
Global Leader
International Mix

Home Students

65%

International Students

35%

Total Students

26,690

Home

17,430

International

9,260

Teaching Excellence Framework (TEF)

The Teaching Excellence Framework (TEF) is a UK government assessment of how well universities deliver teaching, learning, and student outcomes. 

It helps you compare universities based on the quality of their teaching and student support and is widely used in rankings.

Overall Silver
Teaching Bronze
Student Outcomes Silver

Global Rankings

Not all universities appear in every global ranking. Many rankings consider the TEF and the National Student Survey as key indicators of teaching quality and student satisfaction.

# 141
THE
2,000+ Universities
# 110
QS
1,503 Universities
# 137
ARTU
Top 400 Globally
# 201-300
ARWU
1,000 Globally

Queen Mary University of London Courses

National Student Survey Results 2025

The National Student Survey (NSS) is an annual UK-wide survey that collects final-year undergraduates’ feedback on the quality of their courses, covering teaching, learning resources, academic support, and overall satisfaction. Its large sample size, consistent methodology, and focus on student experience make it a trusted indicator for comparing universities.

Queen Mary University of London University Level Scores

Queen Mary University of London received positivity scores of 86.6% for teaching and 84.8% for learning. Click the tabs below to see detailed student survey results and an explanation of the scores.

Theme 1 of the UK’s National Student Survey asks final year students to rate the teaching they have experienced on their course. 

It asks students how clearly tutors explain ideas, how they bring the subject to life, and how well they inspire learning. It’s one of the best ways to gauge students’ direct experiences of teaching quality at the university.

NSS Theme 1: Teaching on my Course – University Score (2026)
Metric Value Explanation
Positivity measure 86.6% The percentage of students who answered positively to the Theme 1 questions about the teaching on their course, for example rating it “good” or “very good”.
Difference to Benchmark -0.5ppt How far this university’s score is above (+) or below (–) its benchmark, in percentage points.
Benchmark 87.1% The score we’d expect for this university given its mix of students and subjects, based on results across the whole sector. It lets you compare very different universities fairly.
How confident can we be?
Materially above benchmark 0% How confident we can be that this university’s true score is at least 2.5 percentage points above its benchmark. The higher this is, the more certain it is that students rate the teaching better than expected.
Broadly in line 100% How confident we can be that this university’s score is within 2.5 percentage points of its benchmark, in other words about what you’d expect.
Materially below benchmark 0% How confident we can be that this university’s true score is at least 2.5 percentage points below its benchmark.

These three figures always add up to around

Theme 2 of the UK’s National Student Survey asks final year students to reflect on the learning opportunities they have experienced during their course.

It covers how well the course has offered opportunities to explore ideas in depth, bring together information from different topics, and apply learning in new or practical ways. This theme gives prospective students a sense of how effectively a course supports exploring the subject matter intellectual growth. 

NSS Theme 2: Learning Opportunities – University Score (2026)
Metric Value Explanation
Positivity measure 84.8% The percentage of students who answered positively to the Theme 2 questions about the learning opportunities on their course, for example “very often” or “to a great extent”.
Difference to Benchmark 0.2ppt How far this university’s score is above (+) or below (–) its benchmark, in percentage points.
Benchmark 84.5% The score we’d expect for this university given its mix of students and subjects, based on results across the whole sector. It lets you compare very different universities fairly.
How confident can we be?
Materially above benchmark 0% How confident we can be that this university’s true score is at least 2.5 percentage points above its benchmark. The higher this is, the more certain it is that students rate their learning opportunities better than expected.
Broadly in line 100% How confident we can be that this university’s score is within 2.5 percentage points of its benchmark, in other words about what you’d expect.
Materially below benchmark 0% How confident we can be that this university’s true score is at least 2.5 percentage points below its benchmark.
These three figures always add up to around 100%. Together, they show how sure we can be about where the university really stands.
Response rate 70.5% The percentage of eligible final-year students who answered the questions in this theme.

Location

London, London

Distance to London  Miles ( KM)

Driving To London N/a

Public Transport To London N/a

Nearest Airport London Heathrow Airport (LHR)

Miles to Nearest Airport 17